Collaborative Fairness

January 17th, 2009 by Kenneth Cohn

“Where is the fairness?” asked an orthopedic surgeon with whom I will be presenting at the ACHE Congress March, 24, 2009 on adding new tools to your physician-hospital relations toolkit.  He has been Department Chair, so he understands the challenges that physicians pose.

His question related to issues regarding employment, i.e. how expensive it was for him to hire a new associate, provide him or her with office space and computer connectivity, and wait for a year till he or she generated enough income to offset expenses, compared to the relative expense of a hospital hiring a new orthopedic surgeon.  I chose not to argue with him about the fixed costs a hospital incurs with its property, plant, and equipment expenses, or the daily staffing challenges to be “right-sized.”

Instead, I recalled a conversation I had with my daughter in junior high school during a car ride from dance class.  As she sobbed, “It’s not fair,” a radio commentator said, “If life were fair, Elvis would still be alive and all the Elvis impersonators would be dead.” 
“Exactly,” I replied.  It was though NPR was connecting directly with us, or more accurately with me:
“Who’s Elvis?” she asked.

My favorite fairness test is, “If life were fair, people who snored would wake themselves up rather than their spouse.”  Robert Fulghum convinced me:

Life is lumpy.  And a lump in the oatmeal, a lump in the throat, and a lump in the breast are not the same lump.  One should learn the difference.
Fulghum R. 1991. Uh-oh: Some Observations from Both Sides of the Refrigerator Door.  NY: Villard Books,146.

If we have established that life is not fair, what do we do about it?  The best advice that I can offer, after traveling through over 40 states, is to reframe, changing perspective to see life as a learning journey rather than a conspiracy.  Dr. Abigail Zuger pointed out that the golden age, that lasted approximately two decades after the passage of Medicare in 1965, was an anomaly.  For example, she mentioned that in 1913, the American Medical Association estimated that no more than 10% of physicians were able to earn a comfortable living. (Zuger A. 2004. “Dissatisfaction with Medical Practice.”New Engl J Med 350(1):69-75.)

I have summarized below the article that I find the most uplifting (Marcus LJ, Dorn BC. 2001. Beyond the malaise of American medicine. J Med Practice Management;16(5):227-230.):

  •  The chasm between physicians’ expectations and current realities is not due solely to managed care, which is a symptom of market pressures, that have forced unpleasant tradeoffs for patients as well as physicians
  • Physicians mourn the loss not only of social interactions with patients but also with colleagues; business deals that have not achieved their goals have turned friends into enemies; for physicians and their families, medicine has become a financial burden rather than a predictable source of income
  • Frustrated physicians seek to rekindle the personal qualities of medical practice that provide confidence, understanding, and reassurance:

Listen to patients talk about what was good about their healthcare experience. They will often express it in terms that describe how much someone paid attention to them, really cared for them, listened to them, or improved their life on a very personal level. There is no machine that can replicate that sensation.

The pendulum has swung far from the center.  What forces will it take to push it back toward a more balanced future for medicine and medical practice?
This is a time of opportunity, one in which we define a new mission and role for ourselves… Consumers want us to remain key to the workings of the healthcare system. 
When our patients are facing a frightening procedure or a discouraging diagnosis, it is common for us to comfort them by offering a course of action, something that can be done to offer them a sense of hope, and with it, a future.  This formula is what good medicine is about, and it is time we do the same for ourselves and for our profession.
Patients may be our strongest allies and advocates in this dialogue… because just as we value our relationships with patients, patients value their relationships with us.  Combined, there is a synergy of understanding that is at the core of what the physician-patient relationship is all about.

We will do what no machine can do: attend to the communication and interpret the information from our computers, translating it into human terms; help people to try to make decisions; and resolve the conflicts that emerge along the way… it will be up to us to attend to the uniquely human dimensions of what healthcare ultimately is all about.
We need to think creatively, we need to be willing to change ourselves, and we need to be willing to find a role for ourselves in a very different healthcare system.  Change is difficult , though things will not change for us unless we are willing to change ourselves. 
Is it possible to retain that thrill of being a physician?  Most certainly yes, since the essence of that thrill derived from the human dimensions of being a doctor. Change in and of itself can be exciting as we envision something new and being a part of making it happen.

 Dr. Zuger quoted a physician from Washington University: “One of the virtues of medicine … is its self-critical nature… Intrinsic dissatisfaction can lead to significant social good.” As a nurse executive counseled me, “It’s the sand in the oyster that creates the pearl.”

What do you think?

  • What do you do to help employed and independent physicians that improves care for your community without playing favorites
  • How do you deal with fairness issues
  • Does creating a level playing field hinder, help (or do both to) patient care
  • How would you complete the sentence, “If life were fair …”

As always, I welcome your input to improve healthcare collaboration.

Kenneth H. Cohn
© 2009, all rights reserved

Posted in Building on Success

Comments

Comment from Carey
Time: January 17, 2009, 10:13 am

Collaborative fairness is an important concept as mentioned. Your summary of the article as well as the questions posed underscore that collaboration and change are essential to redefining a new mission and role for ourselves in a very different healthcare system. But collaboration and change aren’t always easy and aren’t always fair if all parties can’t achieve a synergy of understanding where they become advocates, allies and agents of change in this dialogue. It seems like the healthcare system has plenty of innovative agendas for a different healthcare system rooted in collaboration, community and dialogue but change is precluding collaborative fairness. The willingness to change ourselves and find a new role for ourselves in a different healthcare system takes risks since there are heavy consequences of identity and identification during any change effort. These changes would disrupt our inadequate and outdated understandings of what it means to me a physician, medical partitioner and patient and what it means to engage in collaborative decision making. These changes are a step in the right direction. Moreover, as you point out, change must not only fall on physicians but also on patients who together, create a dialogue that will redefine a new mission that is at its heart, collaborative and fair. We must be willing to change ourselves in order for our role(s) to be conducive to a very different, dynamic and responsible healthcare system…Thanks for a terrific post!

Comment from Andrew Needleman
Time: January 19, 2009, 8:12 am

I agree 100% about “changing perspective to see life as a learning journey rather than a conspiracy”. Perspective on events that occur is more important than the actual event itself.

For example, if your plane is delayed, you can either feel sorry for yourself, or take the extra time to pick up a book or magazine on a topic that you are interested in.

As for your example with the orthopedic surgeon, he probably put his previous employer in the same situation when he was fresh out of school. So, you could look at it as the cost of success that he has to take the risk with each new associate that was taken with him.

Comment from ken
Time: January 19, 2009, 9:24 am

Thanks to Andrew and Carey for their thoughtful replies

I like the feeling that cultural change embodies risk and personal change

All entrepreneurs take prudent risks and view mistakes as learning rather than failure

Comment from free legal living will
Time: March 4, 2009, 12:27 pm

The Tax Fairness Organizing Collaborative is a network of statewide organizations working at the grass-roots level for fair and adequate taxation. Collaborative members believe that educating and organizing those most affected by economic injustice are essential ingredients for achieving sustainable progressive economic policies and greater governmental accountability.

Pingback from Collaborative Uncertainty: Post 73 | Healthcare Collaboration
Time: July 25, 2009, 2:36 pm

[...] and leveraging  the energy of social discontent.  As a nurse mentor pointed out to me in Collaborative Fairness, “It’s the sand in the oyster that creates the [...]

Comment from Gym Equipments
Time: March 9, 2010, 7:11 am

Here i have tried to provide most suitable answers of your queries as per my knowledge:

* What do you do to help employed and independent physicians that improves care for your community without playing favorites => I will discuss with him about my social and business goal and will try to figure out his/her interest first. I will accordingly come up with best suitable deal to him.

* How do you deal with fairness issues => According to my experience, i can say that no one can forced employee for better output. Play fair play safe :)

This is what my thoughts

Share Your Opinions