Collaborative Distinction

January 24th, 2008 by Kenneth Cohn

I confess to being a fan of Maggie Mahar’s Health Beat posts.  In  Health Care Spending: The Basics; Spending on Physicians’ Services-Do We Spend Too Much? Part II, she detailed meticulously what lies behind the 22% of the $2.1 million spent last year on physician services.  I agree with her that income disparities between general practitioners and invasive cardiologists, radiologists, and some surgical specialties need to be resolved.  Many contracting decisions about physician compensation seem arbitrary and capricious to me.

As a practicing general surgeon, I maintain that the distinction between cognitive practitioners and proceduralists is a false distinction.  A spectrum of cognitive behavior is present across all branches of medicine.  Cognition is not an on-off, all-or-none phenomenon, as the story below illustrates.

My father, George A. Cohn, was a neurosurgeon at the Buffalo General Hospital for 40 years until his death in 1991.  Approximately 20 years ago, he was asked to see a SUNY undergraduate, who had been knocked unconscious in a frisbee football game.  On the patient’s CAT scan was a miniscule vascular malformation in an uncommon location, and the question asked was did this malformation contribute to the patient’s loss of consciousness and should it be removed?

Because of the rarity of this malformation, my father consulted the literature and discussed the case with neurosurgical and neuroradiology colleagues throughout the country.  They came to the hypothesis that the malformation and the loss of consciousness were unrelated and that the patient did not need surgery at that time, provided that he developed no symptoms from the vascular malformation.

The student’s parents came from New York City to discuss their son’s condition.  After a brief introduction, my father said, “After conferring with colleagues across the country, I think,”

“What do you mean, ‘I think,’ Doctor,” the patient’s father interrupted, to which my father replied, “You should be damn glad that I think!”

In a specialty that would be labeled procedural, my father took a history, performed a physical examination, interpreted laboratory tests and brain scans in conjunction with colleagues, made a diagnosis, and derived a treatment plan in conjunction with the patient and family.

Like primary care practitioners, surgeons interview patients, perform physical diagnosis, review laboratory tests, and make diagnoses.  In addition, we lead teams, coordinate both surgical and non-surgical care, and serve on hospital committees.  Especially in fields like trauma and surgical oncology, many of the decisions we make involve non-operative care.  Cognitive skills are equally important in the operating room, especially when “the patient does not read the book,” i.e., there are unexpected findings at the time of operation that require sophisticated decision-making, i.e., judgment.

If I ever need surgery again, I will seek care from a competent, compassionate cognitive surgeon.  The words “cognitive” and “surgery” are not an oxymoron.

Posted in Physician Engagement

Comments

Comment from Spence
Time: February 5, 2008, 2:54 pm

It’s frustrating that people don’t understand how much thought goes into a diagnosis and decision in medicine. I work with physicians and I see their efforts and struggles, but it’s neat to see how invested they are in their patients well being. I THINK that you and your readership should know about this site: http://www.arupconsult.com
It is a physician-focused lab test selection and interpretation tool to assist in diagnosis at the point of care and help expand the healthcare provider’s thought process.
I know that there are cognitive, compassionate surgeons out there and I will seek them out just as you will.

Comment from Kenneth H. Cohn
Time: February 5, 2008, 5:18 pm

Thanks Spence for making my readers aware of this free service, maintained by faculty at the University of Utah, that contains more than 1,500 lab tests categorized into disease-related topics.

Comment from Chris Johnson
Time: August 12, 2008, 9:42 pm

I think the notion that Maggie was floating in her blog post was not that surgeons don’t think or don’t have a cognitive basis to what they do–as you point out, it seems obvious to me that’s a false distinction. The issue was more that the historical dominance of procedural specialties of all sorts, but epitomized by surgery, is one of the engines that has driven the cost of medical care in the USA.

The really inflammatory stuff was about behaviors and attitudes. I’m an intensivist who did a large chunk of anesthesiology (and deal with many surgeons, general and otherwise, in the ICU), and I have to say, although the majority are cordial and collegial, many behave in ways that would get them in very hot water if they were in my department and answered to my superiors. Yet that never seems to happen.

Pingback from Collaborative Defense
Time: August 18, 2008, 1:27 pm

[...] For those convinced that there are two distinct camps of surgeons and cognitive physicians, please comment on my post, Collaborative Distinction. [...]

Share Your Opinions